Ergonomics? Common Sense?

Businesses in Michigan are struggling to stay open. I don't think anyone would argue with the me on that.

So, why is Michigan considering legislation that would add an additional regulatory burden on our already over-burdened businesses?

Last week two state commissions initiated formal rule-making to adopt regulations on ergonomics. In case you're wondering, ergonomics is the process of arranging workplace equipment to reduce back pain, frozen shoulders and carpal tunnel syndrome. California is the only state with their own layer of rules on top of those already laid out by OSHA.

Michigan will be even more costly and uncompetitive for businesses. Small business will be the hardest hit and small business is where most new jobs are created.

MIOSHA Inspectgor Doug Kalinowski says the state wants to have a "common sense" approach to ergonomics (rather than hard and fast rules). Where there is disagreement judges could wind up settling disputes. And therein lies the problem. Do we really need to burden our court system with this and do we really need another layer of regulations, uncertainty and costs for Michigan employers?

The other question that needs to be answered is: Do we even need this?

Workers' compensation claims for injuries requiring seven days or more of lost work time declined 49 percent from 2000 to 2007.

So, my question to Mr. Kalinowski is: Can you really justify this? Really?